ReachingOut 2015 Subject Matrix

AUTOBIO-GRAPHICAL CHAPTERS

ACADEMIC BACK-GROUND FOR   RESEARCH  AND CHOICE OF  METHODO-LOGY

RESEARCH PROCESS- INTERACTION BETWEEN OFER & ANAT CONCLUDING IN RO WORKING MODEL

OUTCOMES AND DESEMINATION

OPPOSITION OF DERBY STAFF TO RESEARCH PROCESS- COMPLAINTS PROCEDURES

SERVICES PROVIDED BY KEYLIM SHLUVIM, REGA LIFNAI, &

BAR HAGSHAMA

Ofer's autobiographic background

Adolescents at risk

Case reports

Working Model of RO psychotherapy

Ofer’s Timeline

2007-2012.

2013

2014

2015

Home-based psychotherapy for children, adolescents and their families

Anat’s autobiographic background.

Search for methodology

 

 

Claims for authenticity and Singularity

 

Ethics

Anat’s interviews

Disclosure of Psychotherapists

Self-disclosure wordpress.com

Parental Guidance Course- Anat

Letters of appeal  & complaint to:

•    Guy Daly (2012)

•    Ms Lynn Senior

•    Prof Philip Plowden

•    Dr Sarah Rawlinson

•    OIA

Parental Guidance Courses - Anat

 

Ethics: Choice/Decision being made to investigate therapists Decision making process and not the patients themselves

Democratic discussion of cases and decision- making -process, between Ofer and Anat

Training of potential therapeutic mentors and psychotherapists

Anat’s timeline of events and demand for academic recognition of her research process

Rega- Lifnai

Bar Hagshama

 

ReachingOut in psychotherapy

Forming of a theory

 

Critics of the theory

Transfer of components of RO to other professional practitioners (teachers, health care professionals etc)

Anat's complaint procedure

Bar Hagshama

 

RO knowledge Evolution

Working Model of RO psychotherapy

Anat's blog wordpress.com

Ofer's blog wordpress.com

 Documents sent to O.I.A.

 





Comments